They are. That's the reson [sic] they lost: because white men realized that voting for the democrats would be like a jew voting for the NsdAP.
Sjws/ intersectional feminists/liberals are to white men as nazism is to jews: The fundamental basis of modern feminist thought is patriarchy theory. This theory implies that men have more political, economic and social power than they deserve and this situation has arisen from oppression; Men have kept women down and reserved high status positions for themselves. The patriarchy can't really be proven to exist or is detectable in any form, it's more of a conglomeration of social norms.
This is eerily similar of the argument Hitler brought forth against the jews. He called it international/world jewry: Jewish thought and ideology is injected in governments and higher classes of power; This has allowed jews to take high status positions for themselves. They have kept hardworking germans down and basically build upon their backs. Jewry can also not really be proven to exist and is also not tangible as a concept, but is more of a shadowy conglomeration of social norms.
Out of patriarchy theory arise several other ideas, for example toxic masculinity. The concept of maleness is a creation of patriarchy designed to keep women down and gender roles in place; It is also responsible for most or all of the oppression and conflict in the world, as toxic masculinity forces men into the role of oppressor and warmongerer. There seems to be no real difference between masculinity and toxic masculinity, so it comes down to the following:
It's not that feminists hate men, which is what they again and again repeat, but that they hate everything they are.
This is very similar to the concept of unclean blood. Jews are born with unclean blood, which forces them into the role of a parasite and warmongerer. They oppress the german people and were also ultimately responsible for them starting and losing a war with other european people who have in general cleaner blood closer to the aryan ideal.
Hitler also said several times that he has nothin against the jews per se; He doesn't hate them, he just sees it as fact that their blood makes them turn into parasites and opressors. This is why they need to go.
Male allies: To prove that they don't hate men, feminists will often say that there are many 'male allies' in modern feminism. These men have rejected (toxic) masculinity and socially informed gender roles and behaviours and have taken up the fight against the patriarchy. It is true that in the eyes of most feminists, these people will never have the same worth as female members, since they have never faced the same oppression as women; But through their service to feminist thought, they are at least partially redeemed.
Half-jews: Half-jews are basically people who have mixed, partially jewish heritage. Half-jews can basically go either way: Their jewish unclean, blood can come through or their aryan heritage. The best way to prove this is on the battlefield; Since that's the place true aryan heroes can truly shine, a half-jew can prove his worth by fighting alongside his german brothers-in-arms. It is true that he will never be regarded as a fully aryan member of the master race (he also won't be allowed to procreate), but he can through his service at least partially redeem himself. (I seem to recall that the concept of half-jews has been abandoned in later years, but still...)
I could go on endlessly, but I will close with one of the most striking examples of the similarities of feminsm and nazism: Intersectional feminism and the progressive stack.
Intersectional feminism is a concept of not only recognizing women as an oppressed class, but taking other people from other victim-classes into account. Out of this concept arises the progressive stack: The society has to award more sympathy and help, the higher up you are on that stack; This has been called by anti-feminists the "victim-olympics." As a woman is oppressed by a man, a black person (or other minority) is oppressed by a white person, someone disabled by someone able-bodied, a homosexual by a heterosexual, a transgender by a cisgender, etc. The thing of it is that the nazis had almost the exact same stack, only in reverse order: They have race, where the jews stand lowest, followed by slavs (an outlier; Slavs are just white people in intersectional feminism) and blacks, then non-aryan whites, then middle easterners, who Hitler liked especially because of their anti-semitism (another outlier; middle-eastern muslims are very highly regarded by intersectional feminism), then asians (called 'honorary aryans' by Hitler himself; Also ignored and otherwise treated like white people by intersectional feminists), then lower caste aryans, then true nordic aryans. They also didn't like disabled people, even having euthanasia programs in place for them. The same for homosexuals. I'm not sure they even knew transgender people existed, but I'm pretty certain they would have killed them as well. The nazis actually saw women as of equal or higher worth to men in general, but still preferred men to build their society, so...
As you can see, the person at the highest point of the regressive stack, a black, transgender, lesbian, disabled woman, would be at the lowest point in the nazis' eyes. You might say: "See, they are the polar opposites of nazis, not at all similar!" But that's not exactly true: Rather, they are the mirror image of them and thus equally reprehensible.?"
The really bad part is that this pretty much applies to everything libs believe. You can find and replace every keyword with the equivalent white term and it's no different than what they say about whites or the rich. And that should give everyone pause to think these pseudo-nazis are actually considered "compassionate" and "egalitarian" when they're really just sexist and racist against white men.